000			03857nam a22005535i 4500
001			978-94-007-6067-7
003			DE-He213
005			20140220082940.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			130404s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9789400760677 _9978-94-007-6067-7
024	7		_a10.1007/978-94-007-6067-7 _2doi
050		4	_aK201-487
050		4	_aB65
050		4	_aK140-165
072		7	_aLAB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW079000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aPHI021000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a340.1 _223
100	1		_aFerrer Beltrán, Jordi. _eeditor.
245	1	0	_aNeutrality and Theory of Law _h[electronic resource] / _cedited by Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso, Diego M. Papayannis.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013.
300			_aXII, 273 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v106
505	0		_aPreface -- The Province of Jurisprudence Underdetermined; Juan Carlos Bayón -- Necessity, Importance, and the Nature of Law; Frederick Schauer -- Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory; Brian Bix -- Alexy Between Positivism and non-Positivism; Eugenio Bulygin -- The Architecture of Jurisprudence ; Jules Coleman -- Norms, Truth and Legal Statements; Jorge Rodríguez -- Juristenrecht. Inventing Rights, Obligations, and Powers; Riccardo Guastini -- The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism; Brian Leiter -- Normative Legal Positivism, Neutrality, and the Rule of Law; Bruno Celano -- On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning; Wilfrid Waluchow -- Between Positivism and Non-Positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin; Robert Alexy -- The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence; Dan Priel -- Jurisprudential Methodology: Is Pure Interpretation Possible?; Kevin Walton.    .
520			_aThis book brings together twelve of the most important legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and Civil Law traditions. The book is a collection of the papers these philosophers presented at the Conference on Neutrality and Theory of Law, held at the University of Girona, in May 2010. The central question that the conference and this collection seek to answer is: Can a theory of law be neutral? The book covers most of the main jurisprudential debates. It presents an overall discussion of the connection between law and morals, and the possibility of determining the content of law without appealing to any normative argument. It examines the type of project currently being held by jurisprudential scholarship. It studies the different approaches to theorizing about the nature or concept of law, the role of conceptual analysis and the essential features of law.  Moreover, it sheds some light on what can be learned from studying the non-essential features of law. Finally, it analyzes the nature of legal statements and their truth values. This book takes the reader a step further to understanding law.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aGenetic epistemology.
650		0	_aPhilosophy of law.
650		0	_aCriminology.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650	2	4	_aPhilosophy of Law.
650	2	4	_aCriminology & Criminal Justice.
650	2	4	_aEpistemology.
700	1		_aMoreso, José Juan. _eeditor.
700	1		_aPapayannis, Diego M. _eeditor.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9789400760660
830		0	_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v106
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6067-7
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c99799 _d99799