000 | 03267nam a22005295i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 978-3-642-32633-2 | ||
003 | DE-He213 | ||
005 | 20140220082853.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 121213s2013 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9783642326332 _9978-3-642-32633-2 |
||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-642-32633-2 _2doi |
|
050 | 4 | _aK7000-7720.22 | |
050 | 4 | _aK7073-7078 | |
072 | 7 |
_aLB _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAM _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW016000 _2bisacsh |
|
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a340.9 _223 |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a340.2 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aHartz, Emily. _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFrom the American Civil War to the War on Terror _h[electronic resource] : _bThree Models of Emergency Law in the United States Supreme Court / _cby Emily Hartz. |
264 | 1 |
_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013. |
|
300 |
_aX, 112 p. _bonline resource. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Part I: Three Models of Emergency Law: The Rights Model -- The Extra Legal Model -- The Procedural Model -- Part II: Emergency Law in the Context of Terrorism: Rasul v. Bush -- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld -- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld -- Boumediene v. Bush -- Concluding Remarks. | |
520 | _aThis book offers a systematic and comprehensive account of the key cases that have come to shape the jurisprudence on emergency law in the United States from the Civil War to the War on Terror. The legal questions raised in these cases concern fundamental constitutional issues such as the status of fundamental rights, the role of the court in times of war, and the question of how to interpret constitutional limitations to executive power. At stake in these difficult legal questions is the issue of how to conceive of the very status of law in liberal democratic states. The questions with which the Supreme Court justices have to grapple in these cases are therefore as philosophical as they are legal. In this book the Court's arguments are systematized according to categories informed by constitutional law as well as classic philosophical discussions of the problem of emergency. On this basis, the book singles out three legal paradigms for interpreting the problem of emergency: the rights model, the extra-legal model and the procedural model. This systematic approach helps the reader develop a philosophical and legal overview of central issues in the jurisprudence on emergency. | ||
650 | 0 | _aLaw. | |
650 | 0 | _aPhilosophy of law. | |
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical science _xPhilosophy. |
|
650 | 0 | _aConstitutional law. | |
650 | 1 | 4 | _aLaw. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aConstitutional Law. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPolitical Philosophy. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPhilosophy of Law. |
710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783642326325 |
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32633-2 |
912 | _aZDB-2-SHU | ||
999 |
_c97267 _d97267 |