000			03103nam a22005055i 4500
001			978-3-319-01799-0
003			DE-He213
005			20140220082509.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			131123s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319017990 _9978-3-319-01799-0
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0 _2doi
050		4	_aBC1-199
072		7	_aHPL _2bicssc
072		7	_aPHI011000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a160 _223
100	1		_aTahin, Gábor. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aHeuristic Strategies in the Speeches of Cicero _h[electronic resource] / _cby Gábor Tahin.
264		1	_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2014.
300			_aXVI, 193 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aArgumentation Library, _x1566-7650 ; _v23
505	0		_aForeword -- Acknowledgement -- Table of Contents -- Preface.- Chapter 1 Introduction: The Problem of Analysis -- Chapter 3 The Origins of Heuristic Argumentation: Probable Arguments in Ancient Rhetoric -- Chapter 4 Cicero’s Models: Heuristic Arguments in the Greek Orators -- Chapter 5 Pro Flacco -- Chapter 6  Pro Sulla.- Chapter 7 Pro Murena.- Chapter 8 Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino -- Chapter 9 Pro Milone -- Chapter 10 Pro Cluentio -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index.
520			_aThis book introduces a new form of argumentative analysis: rhetorical heuremes. The method applies the concepts of heuristic thinking, probability, and contingency in order to develop a better understanding of complex arguments in classical oratory. A new theory is required because Greek and Roman rhetoric cannot provide detailed answers to problems of strategic argumentation in the analysis of speeches. Building on scholarship in Ciceronian oratory, this book moves beyond the extant terminology and employs a concept of heuristic reasoning derived from the psychology of decision making and mathematical problem solving. The author analyses selected passages from Cicero’s forensic speeches where arguments of probability are deployed, and shows that the Sophistic concept of probability can link ancient rhetoric and modern theories of argumentation. Six groups of heuremes are identified, each of which represents a form of probabilistic reasoning by which the orator plays upon the perception of the jurors.
650		0	_aPhilosophy (General).
650		0	_aPhilosophy, classical.
650		0	_aLogic.
650		0	_aLinguistics.
650		0	_aHumanities.
650	1	4	_aPhilosophy.
650	2	4	_aLogic.
650	2	4	_aClassical Studies.
650	2	4	_aHistorical Linguistics.
650	2	4	_aClassical Philosophy.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319017983
830		0	_aArgumentation Library, _x1566-7650 ; _v23
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c92741 _d92741