Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk [electronic resource] : A Comparative Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia / by Susan Donkin.

By: Donkin, Susan [author.].
Contributor(s): SpringerLink (Online service).
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: SpringerBriefs in Criminology: 1Publisher: New York, NY : Springer New York : Imprint: Springer, 2014Description: XV, 89 p. 3 illus. online resource.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781461487050.Subject(s): Social sciences | Criminology | Social Sciences | Criminology & Criminal Justice | Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative LawDDC classification: 364 Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Introduction -- Legal Framework -- Criminological Insights -- From Crime Prevention to Crime Pre-emption -- Control Order Case Studies -- Discussion.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: This Brief takes a provocative look at existing socio-legal literature with a comparative study of terrorism control orders, focusing on how the concept of pre-emption fits within a traditional criminological framework.  This timely work examines how such measures might be conceived and interpreted within a situational crime prevention approach. Over the past decade, socio-legal scholars have identified a rise in pre-emptive control mechanisms to respond to terrorism and other threats in the post-9/11 world. Many have argued that this pre-emptive rationale has been used to justify the introduction of measures that transcend established legal and risk frameworks, to deal with individuals or groups thought to pose a threat to the state or its citizens.  Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk: A Comparative Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia will be of interest to researchers in Criminology and Criminal Justice, particularly with a focus on terrorism, risk assessment, and human rights.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Introduction -- Legal Framework -- Criminological Insights -- From Crime Prevention to Crime Pre-emption -- Control Order Case Studies -- Discussion.

This Brief takes a provocative look at existing socio-legal literature with a comparative study of terrorism control orders, focusing on how the concept of pre-emption fits within a traditional criminological framework.  This timely work examines how such measures might be conceived and interpreted within a situational crime prevention approach. Over the past decade, socio-legal scholars have identified a rise in pre-emptive control mechanisms to respond to terrorism and other threats in the post-9/11 world. Many have argued that this pre-emptive rationale has been used to justify the introduction of measures that transcend established legal and risk frameworks, to deal with individuals or groups thought to pose a threat to the state or its citizens.  Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk: A Comparative Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia will be of interest to researchers in Criminology and Criminal Justice, particularly with a focus on terrorism, risk assessment, and human rights.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

2017 | The Technical University of Kenya Library | +254(020) 2219929, 3341639, 3343672 | library@tukenya.ac.ke | Haile Selassie Avenue